Ethical Violence From an Indigenous Lens


Ethical violence is what happens when harm is delivered in the name of “help,” “safety,” “professionalism,” “policy,” or “the greater good.” It is violence that wears a clean uniform.

It often arrives with paperwork, credentials, and calm voices. It can be unintentional, but it is still harmful, especially when it is backed by systems that hold power over Indigenous lives.


From an Indigenous lens, ethical violence is not only about individual behaviour. It is about relationship, responsibility, and history. It is about what happens when a system claims moral authority while refusing to be accountable to the people it impacts.


What makes violence “ethical” in the eyes of a system?


Ethical violence is usually justified through language like:
• “This is evidence-based.”
• “This is best practice.”
• “This is the policy.”
• “This is for your own good.”
• “We have to treat everyone the same.”


These phrases can be true in some contexts. But they can also become shields, ways to avoid listening, adapting, repairing, or naming harm. When a system’s ethics are built without Indigenous worldviews and then enforced onto Indigenous people, “ethics” can become another tool of control.


How ethical violence shows up for Indigenous people


Because of colonization, many Indigenous people have experienced “care” as surveillance, punishment, removal, and forced compliance. Ethical violence often repeats those patterns in modern forms.


Common examples include:


• Pathologizing Indigenous responses to trauma (grief, anger, distrust, spiritual experiences) while ignoring the context that created them.
• Forced neutrality: expecting Indigenous clients to speak about racism or intergenerational harm in a “calm, clinical” way to be taken seriously.
• Cultural extraction: borrowing ceremony, teachings, or language for “interventions” without permission, training, or community accountability.
• One-size-fits-all treatment that dismisses kinship, land-based healing, community, and spirit as “non-clinical.”
• Gatekeeping and credentialism that treat Indigenous knowledge as “an add-on,” while Western frameworks are treated as the default truth.
• Risk and safety practices that escalate to police, child welfare, or institutional control without fully considering Indigenous-specific harms and histories.


Ethical violence is especially sharp when Indigenous people are told they are “safe” while their lived experience says otherwise.


The Indigenous lens: harm is relational


Many Indigenous worldviews understand harm as something that happens in relationships, between people, within families, between Nations, and between humans and the natural world. Healing is also relational.
So when a system causes harm and then refuses repair, refuses accountability, or refuses to change, that is violence. Even if it is “within policy.” Even if it is “standard.”


From this lens, ethics are not just rules. Ethics are:


• Respect (for spirit, story, boundaries, and belonging)
• Reciprocity (not taking more than you give)
• Responsibility (to the people you serve, not just your profession)
• Reparation (repair when harm happens)
• Relational accountability (being answerable to the community, not only institutions)
“Treating everyone the same” is not the same as fairness


A common doorway into ethical violence is the belief that fairness means sameness.


Indigenous clients often need care that recognizes:


• the impact of intergenerational trauma
• ongoing racism and systemic discrimination
• jurisdictional barriers and funding gatekeeping
• the reality of being over-policed and over-surveilled
• the role of culture, ceremony, land, language, and community in wellness


Equity is not special treatment. It is truthful treatment.


What ethical practice can look like instead?


Ethical care from an Indigenous lens is not perfect. It is accountable. It is humble. It is willing to be corrected.


Here are grounded shifts that reduce ethical violence:


• Ask permission, not just questions. “Is it okay if we talk about this?”
• Name power. “This system has harmed Indigenous people. I don’t want to repeat that here.”
• Believe lived experience. Don’t require clients to prove racism, trauma, or harm.
• Offer choice and pacing. Consent is not a one-time checkbox.
• Include spirit and culture when invited. Let clients define what healing includes.
• Avoid cultural performance. Relationship matters more than symbolism.
• Repair quickly. If you misstep, acknowledge it, apologize, and change.
• Be community-accountable. Learn from Indigenous teachers and local protocols.


A closing reflection


Ethical violence is painful because it can make people doubt themselves. It can make someone feel “too sensitive,” “too angry,” or “too much,” when what they are actually doing is responding to harm with wisdom.
Indigenous teachings remind us that healing is not only an individual journey, but it is also a collective responsibility. Ethics are not proven by credentials. They are proven by how we treat people when it would be easier not to.


If you are a helper, a clinician, a leader, or a system worker: your job is not to be seen as ethical. Your job is to be accountable to the people you serve.


This blog is offered as reflection and education, not as a substitute for therapy, legal advice, or Nation-specific guidance. Teachings and protocols vary by community; when in doubt, seek local Indigenous knowledge holders and follow appropriate permissions.

(Samaria) Nancy Cardinal

(Samaria) Nancy Cardinal

Indigenous Therapy Specialist

Contact Me